Blog

Articles and legal news from the Atkinson Vinden Team.

Employment Classifications Matter: Casuals

Employment Law

Many businesses legitimately employ casuals when there are major variations in labour requirements. However in many situations, casuals end up working a regular pattern of hours of work over long periods of time.  When is a casual really a casual? Getting this detail right can have huge implications for both employers and works.

The recent decision of Workpac Pty Ltd v Skene [2018] FCAFC 131 (Skene) provides some key insights into this issue. Skene was employed as a ‘casual’ dump-truck operator in a Queensland mine. He received a flat hourly rate and worked regular days and hours. As a casual employee, he received a casual loading in lieu of benefits including annual leave and personal leave. His employer mistakenly believed that because Skene was a casual, they could simply terminate his employment without any consequences. They were wrong!

After his employment terminated, Skene applied to the Federal Circuit Court claiming that he was in fact a permanent employee and entitled to appropriate benefits. The court agreed with him – even though he was called a casual and paid as a casual, when the details of the arrangement were closely inspected, the truth was that his working hours were no different to those of a permanent employee.

Employers should review the nature of its relationships with casual employees. In Skene, the Court reiterated that indicators of a true casual employment relationship include: irregular work patterns; uncertainty as to the period of which employment is offered; discontinuity of work; and intermittency of work and unpredictability.

Employers should also review their contracts with casual employees. In Skene, the contract did not expressly identify whether a casual loading was included, how much of the rate the loading represents (for example, 25%), and what the loading is paid in lieu of (such as annual leave). It was then easier for the Court to find that Skene was not truly a casual employee.

Skene may yet be challenged in the High Court. However, it is worth employers reviewing its current arrangements with casual employees to ensure that they reflect a true casual employment relationship.  Please contact any member of the AV employment team if you have any enquiries.

PDF

Protecting your reputation starts with simplifying the complex. This handy checklist should quickly point you in the right direction and help you understand whether you have a case, and where to start to secure the best possible outocme.